Cerdas Menyusun Skripsi Kuantitatif Pendidikan Keteknikan di Era AI dan Teknologi Masa Depan

Adeoye, M. A. (2023). Review of sampling techniques for education. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 2(2), 87–94. https://www.ejournal.bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajsed/article/viewFile/230/214

Ahmad, N. A., Elias, N. F., Sahari, N., & Mohamed, H. (2023). Learning management system acceptance factors for technical and vocational education training (TVET) institutions. TEM Journal, 12(2), 1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-61

Ahmad, N., Alias, F. A., & Abdul Razak, N. A. (2023). Understanding population and sample in research: Key concepts for valid conclusions. SIG e-Learning@CS, Universiti Teknologi MARA. https://appspenang.uitm.edu.my/sigcs/2023-2/Articles/20234_UnderstandingPopulationAndSampleInResearch.pdf

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662

Ahmid, S. S., Baskaran, S., & Singh, P. (2023). The influence of innovative characteristics, work readiness, and vocational self concept on employability of vocational college students. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 10(3), 288–317. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.10.3.2

Amelia, R. N., Listiaji, P., Dewi, N. R., Heriyanti, A. P., Atmaja, B. D., Shoba, T. M., & Sajidi, I. (2024). Developing and validating a rubric for measuring skills in designing science experiments for prospective science teachers. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v10i1.65853

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. https://www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/standards_2014edition.pdf

American Psychological Association. (2024). Figure setup. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/tables-figures/figures

American Psychological Association. (2024). Table setup. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/tables-figures/tables

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Journal article reporting standards. APA Style. https://apastyle.apa.org/jars

Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266

Bach, B., Keck, M., Rajabiyazdi, F., Losev, T., Meirelles, I., Dykes, J., Laramee, R. S., AlKadi, M., Stoiber, C., Huron, S., Perin, C., Morais, L., Aigner, W., Kosminsky, D., Boucher, M., Knudsen, S., Manataki, A., Aerts, J., Hinrichs, U., Roberts, J. C., & Carpendale, S. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in data visualization education: A call to action. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327378

Barella, Y., Fergina, A., Mustami, M. K., Rahman, U., & Alajaili, H. M. A. (2024). Quantitative methods in scientific research. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora, 15(1), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v15i1.71528

Barroga, E., & Matanguihan, G. J. (2022). A practical guide to writing quantitative and qualitative research questions and hypotheses in scholarly articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(16), Article e121. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e121

Barroga, E., Matanguihan, G. J., Furuta, A., Arima, M., Tsuchiya, S., Kawahara, C., Takamiya, Y., & Izumi, M. (2023). Conducting and writing quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(37), Article e291. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e291

Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, Article 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370

Boyd, R. J., Powney, G. D., & Pescott, O. L. (2023). We need to talk about nonprobability samples. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 38(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.01.001

Branson, Z., Jenny, D., Lee, K. B., Rubien, N., Stoudt, S., & VanderPlas, S. (2025). The landscape of college level data visualization education. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2025.2537049

Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023). MAILS: Meta AI literacy scale: Development and testing of an AI literacy questionnaire based on well-founded competency models and psychological change and meta-competencies. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), Article 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014

Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, Article 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Chaudhuri, A., & Pal, S. (2022). A comprehensive textbook on sample surveys. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1418-8

Chiang, F. K., Shang, X., & Qiao, L. (2022). Augmented reality in vocational training: A systematic review of research and applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, Article 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107125

Chiang, T. H. C., Shang, X., & Qiao, L. (2022). Augmented reality in vocational training: A systematic review of research and applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107125

Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising. Publications, 11(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002

Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118

Chuenyindee, T., Montenegro, L. D., Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Nadlifatin, R., Ayuwati, I. D., Sittiwatethanasiri, T., & Robas, K. P. E. (2022). The perceived usability of the learning management system during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating system usability scale, technology acceptance model, and task-technology fit. Work, 73(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-220015

Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association, & World Association of Medical Editors. (2022). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/guideline/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/research-design/book270550

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book270550

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2024). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-planning-conducting-and-evaluating-quantitative-and-qualitative-research/P200000010566/9780138173784

Cunningham, S. A., & Muir, J. A. (2023). Data cleaning. In A. L. Nichols & J. Edlund (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of research methods and statistics for the social and behavioral sciences (Chapter 21). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009010054.022

Dehghan, H., Esmaeili, S. V., Paridokht, F., Javadzade, N., & Jalali, M. (2022). Assessing the students’ readiness for E-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Heliyon, 8(8), Article e10219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10219

Deschênes, M., Dionne, L., & Parent, S. (2024). Supporting digital competency development for vocational education student teachers in distance education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1452445. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1452445

Deschênes, M., Dionne, L., & Parent, S. (2024). Supporting digital competency development for vocational education student teachers in distance education. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1452445. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1452445

Directory of Open Access Journals. (2022, September 15). Revised principles of transparency and best practice released. https://blog.doaj.org/2022/09/15/revised-principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-released/

DOAJ. (2026). Directory of Open Access Journals. https://doaj.org/

Dorsah, P. (2026). The use of Cronbach’s alpha reliability in educational research: A systematic review. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 4(2), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2026.4(2).04

Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, Article 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060

Elsevier. (2026). Scopus: Abstract and citation database. https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus

Enders, C. K. (2022). Applied missing data analysis (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Applied-Missing-Data-Analysis/Craig-Enders/9781462549863

ERIC. (2026). Education Resources Information Center. https://eric.ed.gov/

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/153756

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d81a0d54-5348-11ed-92ed-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2025). Digital competence framework: DigComp. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/education-and-training/digital-transformation-education/digital-competence-framework-digcomp_en

European Commission. (2026). Guidelines on the ethical use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning. European Education Area.

European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/153756

Fadhly, F. Z. (2022). Extensive reading as a gateway to create research gap: Valuable lessons from Indonesian expert authors. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 7(2), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v7i2.537

Fahira, S. I., Dewi, I. P., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Castro, R. C. (2025). Augmented reality to enhance informatics learning outcomes: A quasi-experimental study in vocational education. Journal of Hypermedia & Technology-Enhanced Learning, 3(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.58536/j-hytel.167

Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/discovering-statistics-using-ibm-spss-statistics/book285130

Firmansyah, D., & Dede. (2022). Teknik pengambilan sampel umum dalam metodologi penelitian: Literature review. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik, 1(2), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i2.937

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/how-to-design-and-evaluate-research-in-education-fraenkel.html

Francis, M., Avoseh, M., Card, K., Newland, L., & Streff, K. (2023). Student privacy and learning analytics: Investigating the application of privacy within a student success information system in higher education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 10(3), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7975

Garuda. (2026). Garba Rujukan Digital. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/

Garzón, J. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: Trends, benefits, and challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084

Gottfried, J. (2024). Practices in data-quality evaluation: A large-scale review of online survey studies published in 2022. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459241236414

Goyal, M., Gupta, C., & Gupta, V. (2022). A meta-analysis approach to measure the impact of project-based learning outcome with program attainment on student learning using fuzzy inference systems. Heliyon, 8(8), Article e10248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10248

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hariyanto, D., Yatmono, S., Khairudin, M., & Köhler, T. (2022). Students e-learning readiness towards education 4.0: Instrument development and validation. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(3), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v12i3.51798

Hirsch, R. (2022). Sampling. In Statistical hypothesis testing with Microsoft Office Excel (pp. 11–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04202-7_2

IBM. (2026). IBM SPSS Statistics. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics

IEEE. (2026). About IEEE Xplore. https://innovate.ieee.org/about-the-ieee-xplore-digital-library/

Illowsky, B., & Dean, S. (2023). Introductory statistics 2e. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/details/books/introductory-statistics-2e

International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). International Center for Academic Integrity.

International Labour Organization, & UNESCO. (2020). The digitization of TVET and skills systems. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/publications/digitization-tvet-and-skills-systems

Jaeger, S. R., & Cardello, A. V. (2022). Factors affecting data quality of online questionnaires: Issues and metrics for sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference, 102, Article 104676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104676

Jiang, X., Xu, J., & Xu, X. (2024). An overview of domestic and international applications of digital technology in teaching in vocational education: Systematic literature mapping. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 16867–16899.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (8th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/educational-research/book277701

Karanam, S. A. K., Choi, S., & Lyons, K. W. (2025). A systematic review of digital twin and virtual learning environment in manufacturing education. Manufacturing Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.04.024

Karimian, Z., & Chahartangi, F. (2024). Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure educational agility: A psychometric assessment using exploratory factor analysis. BMC Medical Education, 24, Article 1284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06307-z

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kestin, G., Miller, K., Klales, A., Milbourne, T., & Ponti, G. (2025). AI tutoring outperforms in-class active learning: An RCT introducing a novel research-based design in an authentic educational setting. Scientific Reports, 15, 17458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97652-6

Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, Article 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

Kholifah, N., Nurtanto, M., Sutrisno, V. L. P., Majid, N. W. A., Subakti, H., Daryono, R. W., & Achmadi, A. (2025). Unlocking workforce readiness through digital employability skills in vocational education graduates: A PLS-SEM analysis based on human capital theory. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101625

Koo, M., & Yang, S.-W. (2025). Likert-type scale. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010018

Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro-Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios-Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8

Kumalasari, R., Sugiharto, D. Y. P., Sugiyo, S., & Sutoyo, A. (2024). Assessing self-efficacy in vocational students: Development and psychometric evaluation of a new scale using exploratory factor analysis. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 13(3), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v13i03.8917

Kumar, V. (2024). Sampling. In International marketing research (pp. 321–354). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54650-1_12

Kurniawati, K., & Suartini, T. (2025). Learning management system utilization and perceived training benefits among vocational teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v15i1.81270

Lakens, D. (2022). Improving your statistical inferences. Eindhoven University of Technology. https://lakens.github.io/statistical_inferences/

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267

Lathifah, D. N. N., & Hidayati, N. (2025). The influence of kinesthetic learning style on student learning outcomes in experience based vocational learning at SMKN 7 Surakarta. Sunan Kalijaga International Journal on Islamic Educational Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/skijier.2025.92.07

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2023). Practical research: Design and process (13th ed.). Pearson.

Li, J., Qiao, X., Liu, J., Liu, Y., & Wang, L. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 19(12), Article e0316269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269

Liu, Y., Zhan, Q., & Zhao, W. (2024). A systematic review of VR/AR applications in vocational education: Models, affects, and performances. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6375–6392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2263043

López, F., Contreras, M., Nussbaum, M., Paredes, R., Gelerstein, D., Alvares, D., & Chiuminatto, P. (2023). Developing critical thinking in technical and vocational education and training. Education Sciences, 13(6), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060590

Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. E. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(3), Article rm33. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134

MacFarlane, A., Russell-Rose, T., & Shokraneh, F. (2022). Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: Issues, challenges and opportunities. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 15, Article 200091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200091

Magana, A. J. (2022). The role of frameworks in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20443

Masuwai, A., Zulkifli, H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2024). Evaluation of content validity and face validity of secondary school Islamic education teacher self-assessment instrument. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2308410. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308410

Matolić, T., Jurakić, D., Greblo Jurakić, Z., Maršić, T., & Pedišić, Ž. (2023). Development and validation of the EDUcational Course Assessment TOOLkit (EDUCATOOL): A 12 item questionnaire for evaluation of training and learning programmes. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1314584. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1314584

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105

Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835

Muijs, D. (2022). Doing quantitative research in education with IBM SPSS statistics (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/doing-quantitative-research-in-education-with-ibm-spss-statistics/book259738

Mukti, B. H. (2025). Methods in health research: Probability and non-probability sampling. Health Sciences International Journal. https://hsij.anandafound.com/journal/article/view/64

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

Naveed, Q. N., Qureshi, M. R. N., Tairan, N., Mohammad, A. H., Shaikh, A., Alsayed, A. O., Shah, A., & Alotaibi, F. M. (2023). Mobile learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566

Negahban, A. (2024). Simulation in engineering education: The transition from physical experimentation to digital immersive simulated environments. Simulation, 100(7), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241229757

Nyström, S. (2024). Teaching with simulators in vocational education and training: From a storing place to a new colleague. Teaching and Teacher Education, 136, 104383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104383

OECD. (2023). Building future-ready vocational education and training systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/28551a79-en

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

OECD. (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/08785bba-en

OECD. (2023). OECD skills outlook 2023: Skills for a resilient green and digital transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/27452f29-en

OECD. (2023a). Building future-ready vocational education and training systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/28551a79-en

OECD. (2023a). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

OECD. (2023b). Building future-ready vocational education and training systems. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/28551a79-en

OECD. (2023b). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en

OECD. (2024). OECD digital economy outlook 2024, Volume 2: Strengthening connectivity, innovation and trust. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3adf705b-en

Ofem, B. I., & Mchi, A. A. (2023). Variable conceptualisation and measurement in environmental research. International Journal of Methodology, 2(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.21467/ijm.2.1.5991

OpenStax. (2023). Introductory statistics 2e: Hypothesis testing with one sample. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/introductory-statistics-2e/pages/9-introduction

Patnawar, S. T. (2023). A comprehensive review on PBL and digital PBL in engineering education: Status, challenges and future prospects. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v37i2/23157

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00242

Pilowsky, J. K., Elliott, R., & Roche, M. A. (2024). Data cleaning for clinician researchers: Application and explanation of a data quality framework. Australian Critical Care, 37(5), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.03.004

Pitaloka, D. A. E., Kusuma, I. Y., Pratiwi, H. P., & Pradipta, I. S. S. (2023). Development and validation of assessment instrument for the perception and attitude toward tuberculosis among the general population in Indonesia: A Rasch analysis of psychometric properties. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1143120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143120

Raifman, S., DeVost, M. A., Digitale, J. C., Chen, Y. H., & Morris, M. D. (2022). Respondent-driven sampling: A sampling method for hard-to-reach populations and beyond. Current Epidemiology Reports, 9, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00287-8

Rho, J., Kim, S., & Zhu, X. (2025). Comparing the deceptive impact of misleading data visualization types. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105465

Rodriguez-Segura, D. (2022). EdTech in developing countries: A review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(2), 171–203. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/2e40df91-909f-4cd2-888d-b9d3bf401f42

Sala, R., Maffei, A., Pirola, F., Enoksson, F., Ljubić, S., Skoki, A., Zammit, J. P., Bonello, A., Podržaj, P., Žužek, T., Priarone, P. C., Antonelli, D., & Pezzotta, G. (2024). Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(3), Article e22712. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22712

Saltos-Rivas, R., Novoa-Hernández, P., & Serrano Rodríguez, R. (2022). How reliable and valid are the evaluations of digital competence in higher education: A systematic mapping study. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211068492

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., Mok, S. Y., & Petko, D. (2024). Running in circles: A systematic review of reviews on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 214, 105024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024

Setiawan, A., Cendana, W., Ayres, M., Yuldashev, A. A., & Setyawati, S. P. (2023). Development and validation of a self-assessment-based instrument to measure elementary school students’ attitudes in online learning. REID: Research and Evaluation in Education, 9(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v9i2.52083

Setiawan, R., Wagiran, W., & Alsamiri, Y. (2024). Construction of an instrument for evaluating the teaching process in higher education: Content and construct validity. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i1.63483

Setiyawan, H., Dardiri, A., Suyetno, A., Muladi, M., Purnomo, P., & Sudjimat, D. A. (2023). The influence of digital and vocational information literacy on students’ learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i2.55921

Setiyawan, H., Suharno, S., & Pambudi, N. A. (2023). The influence of digital and vocational information literacy on student learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i2.53999

Sharifnia, A. M., Kpormegbey, D. E., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2026). A primer of data cleaning in quantitative research: Handling missing values and outliers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 82(1), 970–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16908

SINTA. (2026). Science and Technology Index. Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://sinta.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/

Snyder, H. (2024). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Designs, Codes and Cryptography?

Sofyan, H., Soenarto, Mutohhari, F., & Nurtanto, M. (2022). Students’ career decision-making during online learning: The mediating roles of self-efficacy in vocational education. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1669

Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49, 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1

Sudarsono, B., Tentama, F., Mulasari, S. A., Sukesi, T. W., Sulistyawati, S., Ghozali, F. A., Yuliansyah, H., Nafiati, L., & Sofyan, H. (2022). Development of integrated project-based learning (PjBL-T) model to improve work readiness of vocational high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v12i3.53158

Suhail, N. S., Bahroun, Z. B., & Ahmed, V. A. V. (2024). Augmented reality in engineering education: Enhancing learning and application. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 5, Article 1461145. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1461145

Suhandiah, S., Suhariadi, F., Yulianti, P., & Abbas, A. (2022). Online learning satisfaction in higher education: What are the determining factors? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.35724

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17

Sumargo, B., Budyanra, & Kurniawan, R. (2024). Metode dan pengaplikasian teknik sampling. Bumi Aksara. https://books.google.com/books/about/Metode_dan_Pengaplikasian_Teknik_Samplin.html?id=1HUbEQAAQBAJ

Supriyanto, S., Joshua, Q., Abdullah, A. G., Tettehfio, E. O., & Ramdani, S. D. (2023). Application of augmented reality (AR) in vocational education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i2.54280

Supriyanto, S., Munadi, S., Daryono, R. W., Tuah, Y. A. E., Nurtanto, M., & Arifah, S. (2023). The influence of internship experience and work motivation on work readiness in vocational students: PLS-SEM analysis. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 5(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i1.20033

Suyitno, S., Nurtanto, M., Jatmoko, D., Widiyono, Y., Purwoko, R. Y., Abdillah, F., Setuju, S., & Hermawan, Y. (2025). The effect of work-based learning on employability skills: The role of self-efficacy and vocational identity. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.1.309

Swan, K., Speyer, R., Scharitzer, M., Farneti, D., Brown, T., Woisard, V., & Cordier, R. (2023). Measuring what matters in healthcare: A practical guide to psychometric principles and instrument development. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1225850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225850

Taufan, S., Jayanti, A. R. B., Susita, D., & Frannita, E. L. (2025). Influence of self-efficacy and motivation on work readiness in vocational education students. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(5), 3787–3798. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i5.3501

Tembrevilla, G., Phillion, A., & Zeadin, M. (2024). Experiential learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(1), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20575

The Jamovi Project. (2026). Reliability analysis. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/jmv/reliability.html

Think. Check. Submit. (2024). Books & chapters: Are you submitting your research to a trusted publisher? https://thinkchecksubmit.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ThinkCheckSubmit-Books-English-2024.pdf

Ubaidillah, F. A., Saifullah, Hitomi, A. R., & Bulut, S. (2023). Self-efficacy and academic performance of vocational high school students. Psikoislamika: Jurnal Psikologi dan Psikologi Islam, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/psikoislamika.v20i1.18369

UNESCO. (2022). Transforming technical and vocational education and training for successful and just transitions: UNESCO strategy 2022 to 2029. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383360

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Venta, A., Bailey, C. A., Walker, J., Mercado, A., Colunga Rodriguez, C., Ángel González, M., & Dávalos Picazo, G. (2022). Reverse coded items do not work in Spanish: Data from four samples using established measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 828037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828037

Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). What explains teachers’ trust of AI in education across six countries? arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01627

Villarroel, V., Melipillán, R., Santana, J., & Aguirre, D. (2024). How authentic are assessments in vocational education? An analysis from Chilean teachers, students, and examinations. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1308688. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1308688

Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens: With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Wafudu, S. J., Kamin, Y. B., & Marcel, D. (2022). Validity and reliability of a questionnaire developed to explore quality assurance components for teaching and learning in vocational and technical education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, Article 303. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01306-1

Wagenmakers, E.-J., & JASP Team. (2022). JASP data library. JASP. https://jasp-stats.org/

Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, Article 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Weaver, K. D. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Disclosure (AID) framework: An introduction. College & Research Libraries News, 85(6), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.85.6.226

Wickham, H., Çetinkaya Rundel, M., & Grolemund, G. (2023). R for data science: Import, tidy, transform, visualize, and model data (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media. https://r4ds.hadley.nz/

Wiyanti, I., Tuwoso, T., & Alfianto, I. (2025). The contribution of digital literacy and field work practice to the employability skills of vocational high school students. Sosioedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 14(4), 3674–3683. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6599

World Bank, UNESCO, & International Labour Organization. (2023). Building better formal TVET systems: Principles and practice in low- and middle-income countries. World Bank, UNESCO, and ILO. https://doi.org/10.54675/RVDM3811

World Bank. (2026). Digital technologies in education. https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/topic/education/digital-technologies-in-education

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/

World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.

Wulandari, R. M., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Materialism as personality: Psychometric properties using the Rasch model. Jurnal Psikologi, 50(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.77592

Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An assessment approaches and learning outcomes in technical and vocational education: A systematic review using PRISMA. Sustainability, 14(9), 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095225

Zhang, X., Qian, W., & Chen, C. (2024). The effect of digital technology usage on higher vocational student satisfaction: The mediating role of learning experience and learning engagement. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1508119. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1508119