Pintar Menyusun Skripsi Kualitatif Pendidikan Keteknikan di Era AI dan Teknologi Masa Depan
Keywords:
Kualitatif, Skripsi, AISynopsis
Buku ini membahas penyusunan skripsi kualitatif dalam ruang lingkup pendidikan keteknikan dengan menempatkan transformasi digital, AI, dan teknologi masa depan sebagai konteks utama. Pada bagian awal, pembaca diperkenalkan pada hakikat skripsi kualitatif, karakteristik penelitian kualitatif pendidikan keteknikan, serta pentingnya memahami realitas pendidikan melalui pengalaman, makna, proses, dan konteks lapangan. Buku ini menegaskan bahwa pendidikan keteknikan tidak hanya berlangsung di ruang kelas, tetapi juga di bengkel, laboratorium, ruang komputer, tempat praktik industri, dan lingkungan kerja yang sarat dengan keterampilan nyata. Oleh karena itu, penelitian kualitatif dipandang relevan untuk membaca dinamika pembelajaran praktik, budaya kerja, keselamatan kerja, kesiapan kerja, dan adaptasi teknologi secara lebih mendalam.
Bagian berikutnya mengarahkan pembaca untuk menemukan fenomena penelitian, mengidentifikasi sumber masalah di lapangan, memahami research gap, serta menyusun latar belakang yang aktual dan kontekstual. Buku ini juga menjelaskan cara merumuskan judul, fokus penelitian, pertanyaan penelitian, tujuan, dan manfaat penelitian agar sesuai dengan logika kualitatif. Dalam penelitian kualitatif, fokus kajian tidak diarahkan pada hubungan antarvariabel, tetapi pada pengalaman, persepsi, strategi, proses, budaya, hambatan, makna, dan praktik sosial yang terjadi dalam konteks tertentu. Pembaca juga diarahkan untuk menyusun konsep utama, definisi istilah, ruang lingkup, dan batasan kajian agar penelitian memiliki arah yang jelas tanpa kehilangan keterbukaan terhadap temuan lapangan.
Pada bagian akhir, buku ini membahas pentingnya kajian teori, penelitian terdahulu, research gap, novelty, kerangka berpikir, kerangka konseptual, asumsi penelitian, dan proposisi awal dalam skripsi kualitatif. Kajian teori diposisikan sebagai lensa untuk membaca fenomena, bukan sekadar kumpulan kutipan. Penelitian terdahulu digunakan untuk menunjukkan posisi kajian, menemukan celah penelitian, dan merumuskan kebaruan yang bermakna. Buku ini juga menegaskan bahwa kerangka berpikir dalam penelitian kualitatif berfungsi sebagai peta awal yang membantu peneliti memahami hubungan antara fenomena, teori, konteks, dan arah penggalian data. Secara keseluruhan, buku ini memberi panduan sistematis bagi mahasiswa agar mampu menyusun skripsi kualitatif pendidikan keteknikan yang relevan, reflektif, etis, dan responsif terhadap perkembangan AI serta teknologi masa depan.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, S. T., Watrianthos, R., Samala, A. D., Muskhir, M., & Dogara, G. (2023). Project-based learning in vocational education: A bibliometric approach. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.04.04
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Ahmid, S. S., Tiew, C. C., & Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. (2023). The influence of innovative characteristics, work readiness, and vocational self-concept on employability of vocational college students. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 10(3), 288–317. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.10.3.1
Alfiras, M. I. I., Emran, A. Q., & Mohamed, A. M. (2026). Ethics and governance of generative AI in education: A systematic review on responsible adoption. Discover Education, 5, Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01051-y
Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez Maldonado, R. (2024). Human centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, Article 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Asanre, A. A., Taiwo, T. O., & Odupe, T. A. (2024). Teachers’ perception towards the integration of artificial intelligence in the teaching of mathematics in senior secondary school. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 12(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i2.77349
Ateeq, A. A. A., Alzoraiki, M. A. M., Milhem, M., & Ateeq, R. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Implications for academic integrity and the shift toward holistic assessment. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1470979. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1470979
Barroga, E., & Matanguihan, G. J. (2022). A practical guide to writing quantitative and qualitative research questions and hypotheses in scholarly articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(16), Article e121. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e121
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/systematic-approaches-to-a-successful-literature-review/book268543
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481
Budiarto, M. K., Asrowi, Gunarhadi, Karsidi, R., & Rahman, A. (2024). E-learning platform for enhancing 21st century skills for vocational school students: A systematic literature review. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.5.3417
CASP UK. (2024). CASP checklist: For qualitative research. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. https://casp-uk.net/casp-checklists/CASP-checklist-qualitative-2024.pdf
Catatan singkat: DOI hanya dicantumkan pada sumber yang memang memiliki DOI resmi. Untuk buku dan laporan kelembagaan yang tidak memiliki DOI, akses dilacak melalui laman penerbit atau lembaga resmi.
Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, Article 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358
Chan, S. (Ed.). (2025). Artificial intelligence in vocational education and training: Understanding learner and teacher perspectives on the integration of generative AI through participatory action research. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6001-8
Chiang, F. K., Shang, X., & Qiao, L. (2022). Augmented reality in vocational training: A systematic review of research and applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, Article 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107125
Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., & Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The science of literature reviews: Searching, identifying, selecting, and synthesising. Publications, 11(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197.
Christou, P. A. (2023). How to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research? The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1968–1980. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406
Chubb, L. A. (2023). Me and the machines: Possibilities and pitfalls of using artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231193593
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd6e
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2024). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (7th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-planning-conducting-and-evaluating-quantitative-and-qualitative-research/P200000010566/9780138173784
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Giardina, M. D., & Cannella, G. S. (Eds.). (2023). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Directory of Open Access Journals. (2022). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://doaj.org/
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, Article 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Elsevier. (n.d.). ScienceDirect: Peer-reviewed literature. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://www.elsevier.com/products/sciencedirect
Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus: Abstract and citation database. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus
European Commission: Directorate General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/153756
Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2024). Utilization of AI, big data, and Internet of Things in sustainable innovation. Issues in Information Systems, 25(1), 376–390. https://iacis.org/iis/2024/1_iis_2024_376-390.pdf
Flick, U. (Ed.). (2022). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design (Vols. 1–2). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278
Flick, U. (Ed.). (2024). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research quality. SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-quality/book283878
Garzón, J. (2025). Systematic review of artificial intelligence in education: Trends, benefits, and challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), Article 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084
Google Scholar. (n.d.). About Google Scholar. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). ERIC: Education Resources Information Center. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://eric.ed.gov/
Jerald, H. (2024). Greening TVET for sustainable skill development. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 7(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v7i1.430
Karanam, S. A. K., & Hartman, N. W. (2025). A systematic review of digital twin and virtual learning environments for smart manufacturing education. Manufacturing Letters, 44, 1597–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.179
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). GARUDA: Garba Rujukan Digital. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). SINTA: Science and Technology Index. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://sinta.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Lim, W. M., Dabić, M., Kumar, S., Kanbach, D., Mukherjee, D., Corvello, V., Piñeiro Chousa, J., Liguori, E., Palacios Marqués, D., Schiavone, F., Ferraris, A., Fernandes, C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice. Review of Managerial Science, 16(8), 2577–2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
Létourneau, A., Deslandes Martineau, M., Charland, P., Karran, J. A., Boasen, J., & Léger, P. M. (2025). A systematic review of AI-driven intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) in K-12 education. npj Science of Learning, 10, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00320-7
Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts based, and community based participatory research approaches (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Research-Design/Patricia-Leavy/9781462548972
Lee, S. S., & Moore, R. L. (2024). Harnessing generative AI (GenAI) for automated feedback in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4593
Lee, V. V., van der Lubbe, S. C. C., Goh, L. H., & Valderas, J. M. (2024). Harnessing ChatGPT for thematic analysis: Are we ready? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, Article e54974. https://doi.org/10.2196/54974
Lesman, I., Mulianti, M., Primawati, P., & Kassymova, G. K. (2023). Implementation of project-based learning (PjBL) model to increase students’ creativity and critical thinking skill in vocational creative product subjects. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 6(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.24036/jptk.v6i3.34023
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. E. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(3), Article rm1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134
Magana, A. J. (2022). The role of frameworks in engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20443
Masril, M., Jalinus, N., Ridwan, Ambiyar, Sukardi, & Irfan, D. (2024). Hybrid learning integrated remote laboratory: A pedagogical strategy for future practicum learning. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 14(3), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.14.3.19760
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Mayombe, C. (2024). Promoting youths’ skills acquisition through experiential learning theory in vocational education and training in South Africa. Higher Education, Skills and Work Based Learning, 14(1), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-10-2022-0216
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Miao, F., Shiohira, K., & Lao, N. (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835
Muhtar, M., Suryanti, S., Bachri, B. S., Mila, K., Laili, A. Q., Yuliaturosida, E., & Siyam, I. N. (2025). Implementation of project based learning model in vocational high schools: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Process: International Journal, 15, Article e2025169. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.169
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step by step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Naveed, Q. N., Choudhary, H., Ahmad, N., Alqahtani, J., & Qahmash, A. I. (2023). Mobile learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(18), Article 13566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566
Negahban, A. (2024). Simulation in engineering education: The transition from physical experimentation to digital immersive simulated environments. SIMULATION, 100(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241229757
O’Connor, S., Power, J., Blom, N., & Tanner, D. (2024). Engineering students’ perceptions of problem and project based learning in an online learning environment. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2024.2357404
OECD. (2023). AI and the future of skills, volume 2: Methods for evaluating AI capabilities. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a9fe53cb-en
OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
OECD. (2023). OECD skills outlook 2023: Skills for a resilient green and digital transition. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/27452f29-en
OECD. (2025). How can innovative technologies transform vocational education and training? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fb40f416-en
Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). A systematic review of generative AI for teaching and learning practice. Education Sciences, 14(6), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060636
Oje, A. V., Hunsu, N. J., & May, D. (2023). Virtual reality assisted engineering education: A multimedia learning perspective. Computers and Education: X Reality, 3, Article 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100033
Olmos Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287
Petko, D., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2025). TPACK in context: An updated model. Computers and Education Open, 8, Article 100244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100244
Ravichandran, R. R., & Mahapatra, J. (2023). Virtual reality in vocational education and training: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 3(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.52562/jdle.v3i1.602
Sala, R., Maffei, A., Pirola, F., Enoksson, F., Ljubić, S., Skoki, A., Zammit, J. P., Bonello, A., Podržaj, P., Žužek, T., Priarone, P. C., Antonelli, D., & Pezzotta, G. (2024). Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(3), Article e22712. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22712
Salmons, J. E. (2022). Doing qualitative research online (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/doing-qualitative-research-online-2e/toc
Sayuti, M., Suparmin, S., Rohman, N., Thana, P. M., Rahayu, D. S., Samani, M., Kholifah, N., & Nurtanto, M. (2024). Enhancing safety culture in vocational education: Insights from industrial workshops. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 6(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i2.23532
Snyder, H. (2024). Designing the literature review for a strong contribution. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197704
Sudarsono, B., Tentama, F., Mulasari, S. A., Sukesi, T. W., Sulistyawati, S., Ghozali, F. A., Yuliansyah, H., Nafiati, L., & Sofyan, H. (2022). Development of integrated project based learning model to improve work readiness of vocational high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 12(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v12i3.53158
Suhail, N. S., Bahroun, Z., & Ahmed, V. (2024). Augmented reality in engineering education: Enhancing learning and application. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 5, Article 1461145. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1461145
Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. D. C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards active evidence based learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability, 14(21), Article 13955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955
Supriyanto, S., Joshua, Q., Abdullah, A. G., Tettehfio, E. O., & Ramdani, S. D. (2023). Application of augmented reality (AR) in vocational education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i2.54280
Supriyanto, S., Munadi, S., Daryono, R. W., Tuah, Y. A. E., Nurtanto, M., & Arifah, S. (2022). The influence of internship experience and work motivation on work readiness in vocational students: PLS-SEM analysis. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 5(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i1.20033
Suwastika, N. A., Mayadewi, R. P., & Rahayu, S. (2025). IoT readiness model for urban vocational school. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1534
Tenny, S., Brannan, J. M., & Brannan, G. D. (2022). Qualitative study. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/
Think. Check. Submit. (n.d.). Identify trusted publishers for your research. Retrieved May 10, 2026, from https://thinkchecksubmit.org/
Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (3rd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
Turobov, A., Coyle, D., & Harding, V. (2024). Using ChatGPT for thematic analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08828
UNESCO. (2022). Transforming technical and vocational education and training for successful and just transitions: UNESCO strategy 2022–2029. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383360
UNESCO. (2023). Enhancing TVET through digital transformation in developing countries. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385988
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. Dokumen ini tersedia melalui laman resmi UNESCO dan repositori UNESCO Digital Library.
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. Tautan akses resmi: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers. Dokumen ini juga tersedia melalui repositori UNESCO.
Van Hulst, M. (2025). Abductive analysis in qualitative research. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13856
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens, with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., Bunyamin, B., Sukmawati, W., & Johan, J. (2024). Development of teaching factory model-based artificial intelligence: Improving the quality of learning vocational schools in Indonesia. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 4675–4692. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5979
Wahjusaputri, S., Nastiti, T. I., & Liu, Y. (2024). Development of a hybrid teaching factory model based on school governance in improving employability skills of vocational students. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 14(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v14i1.65108
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, Article 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Yim, I. H. Y., & Wegerif, R. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, and acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) educational learning tools: An exploratory study on AI literacy for young students. Future in Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.65
Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An assessment approaches and learning outcomes in technical and vocational education: A systematic review using PRISMA. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095225
Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., Jalaludin, N. A., & Juhari, N. H. (2023). Identifying and validating vocational skills domains and indicators in classroom assessment practices in TVET. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065195
Zhang, Y. (2024). AI driven transformation of vocational education. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKM.394819
Zontou, E., Harty, C., & Watson, M. (2024). On the role of virtual reality in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2369188
